By Stacie E. Goddard
In Jerusalem and northern eire, territorial disputes have usually appeared indivisible, not able to be solved via negotiation, and vulnerable to violence and warfare. This publication demanding situations the normal knowledge that those conflicts have been the inevitable results of clashing identities, religions, and attachments to the land. to the contrary, it was once radical political rhetoric, and never historic hatreds, that rendered those territories indivisible. Stacie Goddard strains the roots of territorial indivisibility to politicians' suggestions for legitimating their claims to territory. while bargaining over territory, politicians make the most of rhetoric to attract their household audiences and undercut the claims in their rivals. in spite of the fact that, this process has unintentional effects; via resonating with a few coalitions and showing unacceptable to others, politicians' rhetoric can lock them into positions within which they're not able to acknowledge the legitimacy in their opponent's calls for. hence, politicians come to negotiations with incompatible claims, developing territory as indivisible.
Read or Download Indivisible Territory and the Politics of Legitimacy: Jerusalem and Northern Ireland PDF
Similar nationalism books
What's the position of faith in smooth political platforms? This quantity addresses that query via concentrating on ten international locations throughout a number of geographic parts: Western and East-Central Europe, North the US, the center East and South Asia. those international locations are related within the experience that they're devoted to constitutional rule, have embraced a kind of secular tradition, and feature formal promises of freedom of faith.
During this number of Greenfeld's essays, we see her take on the subject of nationalism from an array of angles, each one giving us a different point of view on what Einstein referred to as 'the measles of mankind'. masking the analogies among nationalism and faith, the political value of tradition, the incipience of nationalism in Tudor England, and lots more and plenty extra, Greenfeld's writing is informative and good argued.
What's intended by means of foreign society? On what rules is the proposal of overseas society dependent? How has the proposal of nationalism motivated its evolution? during this booklet James Mayall addresses those questions and sheds very important new gentle at the problems with country and foreign society by way of bringing jointly matters that experience hitherto been tested individually.
The 3rd variation features a new half 5 at the tensions among Arab nationalism and Islam coming up from the hindrance of the countryside and of the de-legitimisation of Pan-Arab regimes. the results of the Arab defeat within the Six-Day battle 1967 and the increase of political Islam within the Seventies are the focal point of the hot half.
- May the Best Man Win: Sport, Masculinity, and Nationalism in Great Britain and the Empire, 1880–1935
- Saving Israel: How the Jewish People Can Win a War That May Never End
- Culture and Economy in the Indian Diaspora
- Instilling Religion in Greek and Turkish Nationalism: A “Sacred Synthesis”
- Puerto Rican Jam: Rethinking Colonialism and Nationalism
Extra resources for Indivisible Territory and the Politics of Legitimacy: Jerusalem and Northern Ireland
The fact that key actors have a choice in their legitimation strategy raises two questions important to a theory of indivisibility. First, why do actors choose particular legitimation strategies? If some actors have access to a range of legitimation strategies, this raises the question of why actors adopt some legitimation strategies and not others. Second, how do legitimation strategies lock actors into any particular position? Why is it that actors, who may choose legitimation strategies at one point in time, find themselves trapped into positions where compromise is impossible?
74 Legitimation strategies’ effects depend on a configuration of variables; outcomes depend on how these strategies interact with extant networks. These causal interactions are neither linear nor constant. Whereas legitimation strategies might produce indivisibility when used in certain networks, they may fail to have any causal effect in others. Methodologically, if we try to reduce causality to the properties of a particular variable, we miss the fact that it is the interaction of these factors that leads to shifts in divisibility.
March and Olsen 1989. On legitimacy and constructivism, see Hall 1999; and Bukovansky 2002. 28 Indivisible Territory and the Politics of Legitimacy define appropriate rules of behavior and even the identities of actors themselves. In following social norms, therefore, actors are compelled to accept legitimate bargains and reject illegitimate ones, even if this undermines their material interests. Despite their substantive differences, these approaches share a strict dichotomy between interests and power on the one hand and legitimacy on the other.